Assignment 2: Overview of Interviewing and Interrogation
A criminal justice professional gathers information through effective interviews and interrogations. Ineffective victim or suspect interviews or interrogations can cost an investigator a case, and understanding the difference between an interview and an interrogation is critical in selecting an appropriate approach for a specific situation. Interviews and interrogations are dynamic, evolving situations, and developing interviewing and interrogation skills takes time and practice. Interrogation involves an accusatory, persuasive approach. Effective interviewers have the ability to quickly establish rapport with their subjects and gain complete, concise, and accurate information about crimes, additional witnesses, and suspects. Building rapport early helps take down barriers to open and clear communication, which is critical in conducting interviews and interrogations.
By Saturday, December 24, 2016, in a minimum of 250 words, post to the Discussion Area your answers to the following:
- What are the qualities of an effective interviewer and interrogator?
- What are the purposes of interviews and interrogations?
- What is the difference between an interview and an interrogation?
- What is D. K. Berlo’s communication process? How does it apply in the criminal justice field?
- What is a purposeful interview?
By Wednesday, January 4, 2017, read and respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. When responding, use contradictions and counterexamples supported by class readings. You can ask questions, disagree with opinions, redirect your thoughts, or ask your classmates to rethink what they have posted and why.
Discussion Grading Criteria and Rubric
All discussion assignments in this course will be graded using a rubric. This assignment is worth 40 points. Download the discussion rubric and carefully read it to understand the expectations